PDA

View Full Version : Divisions of Political Ideology


Phædrus
03-30-2008, 09:03 PM
http://fc04.deviantart.com/fs27/f/2008/090/b/d/Political_Parties_by_Phaedrus2401.jpg

This is my take on the major political divisions, using US terminology. Most of the US populace falls in a semicircle starting in Democrat, sliding down through Republican and the right end of Centrist, through Right Libertarian, and into Social Libertarian. The world as a whole would be fairly random, but with an average falling in the lower-left quadrant of Centrist.

Note, that these are approximate and that there is some overlap. Also, there is ambiguity at the extreme ends of some sectors.

For an idea of where some major political figures would fall on the graph, here's my estimate (economic, social). These are just my interpretations, from what I know of these people:
US
George Bush - 7, 6
Barack Obama - 3, 2
Hillary Clinton - 2, 3
Ron Paul - 8, -1

World
Hugo Chavez - -6, 1
Vladimir Putin - -3, 5
Fidel Castro - -6, 3
Dalai Lama - -4, -5
Tony Blair - 1, 4
Saddam Hussein - 1, 8

Historical
Adolf Hitler - 2, 10
Joseph Stalin - -9, 10
Vladimir Lenin - -10, 4
Franklin Roosevelt - 0, 1
Thomas Paine - 7, -7

Me: 1, -5


By the way, though the graph is from Political Compass, I think that the Political Compass test has some bias in some of the questions and also paints some issues in black and white when there are third solutions.

Viv
03-30-2008, 09:09 PM
http://fc04.deviantart.com/fs27/f/2008/090/b/d/Political_Parties_by_Phaedrus2401.jpg

This is my take on the major political divisions, using US terminology. Most of the US populace falls in a semicircle starting in Democrat, sliding down through Republican and the right end of Centrist, through Right Libertarian, and into Social Libertarian. The world as a whole would be fairly random, but with an average falling in the lower-left quadrant of Centrist.

Note, that these are approximate and that there is some overlap. Also, there is ambiguity at the extreme ends of some sectors.

For an idea of where some major political figures would fall on the graph, here's my estimate (economic, social). These are just my interpretations, from what I know of these people:
US
George Bush - 7, 6
Barack Obama - 3, 2
Hillary Clinton - 2, 3
Ron Paul - 8, -1

World
Hugo Chavez - -6, 1
Vladimir Putin - -3, 5
Fidel Castro - -6, 3
Dalai Lama - -4, -5
Tony Blair - 1, 4
Saddam Hussein - 1, 8

Historical
Adolf Hitler - 2, 10
Joseph Stalin - -9, 10
Vladimir Lenin - -10, 4
Franklin Roosevelt - 0, 1
Thomas Paine - 7, -7

Me: 1, -5


By the way, though the graph is from Political Compass, I think that the Political Compass test has some bias in some of the questions and also paints some issues in black and white when there are third solutions.

If I knew anything about politics, I would prolly take issue with this very professionally drafted chart. As it is, I am still laughing at the link to the Irish language lab...:eek::D

Phædrus
03-30-2008, 09:13 PM
If I knew anything about politics, I would prolly take issue with this very professionally drafted chart. As it is, I am still laughing at the link to the Irish language lab...:eek::D

:D :D :D

Plato
03-31-2008, 06:22 AM
Did you make this yourself?

White Rabbit
04-14-2008, 09:44 PM
Why are the Republican's shown so 'rightwing' on the liberty scale? Their traditional opposition to civil rights and support for warrantless wire-tapping are both ideologically anti-liberty, pro-statist and/or authoritarian.

Admittedly a 'two-by-two crosstab' inproves the accuracy of the model over the traditional 'bipolar' scale, but I still feel these charts hide as much as they presume to reveal.